VALUES AND THE ROMANCE NOVEL61may present a conflict. Students moved among competing discoursesby balancing them, revising some, rethinking others. Awareness ofthis process facilitates our understanding of how readers respond totexts.REFERENCESBook Industry Study Group. (2000).http://www. Rwanational.org/statistics.stm.Charles, John, Mosley, Shelley, & Bouricus, Ann. (1999). Romancing the young adult reader.Voice of Youth Advocates, 21, 6: 414–19.Chodorow, N. (1978).The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Christian-Smith, Linda K. (Ed.). (1993).Texts of desire: Essays on fiction, femininity and schooling.London: The Falmer Press.Crawford, Mary. (1994). Rethinking the romance: Teaching the content and function of gen-der stereotypes in thePsychology of Womencourse.Teaching of Psychology,21, 3, 151–153Donahue, Deidre. (2002). “The look of love is in your eyes.”USA Today, Feb. 7.Grant, Vanessa. (1999). Secrets of romantic conflict.The Writer, 112,5, 10–12.Griffin, Linda. (1999). An analysis of meaning creation through the integration of sociologyand literature: A critical ethnography of a romance reading group. A dissertation pre-sented to the faculties of the University of Houston and Rice University.Gruber, Howard E. (1989). The evolving systems approach to creative work. In Doris B.Wallace & Howard E. Gruber (Eds.),Creative people at work: Twelve cognitive case studies.New York: Oxford University Press.Gruber, Howard E. (1994). The social construction of extraordinary selves: Collaborationamong unique creative people. Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Esther KatzSymposium on the Psychological Development of Gifted Children: Developing Generalvs. Specific Abilities and their Relationship to Diversity. The University of Kansas,Lawrence, Kansas.Heilbrun, C. (1988).Writing a woman’s life. New York: Ballantine Books.Holland,DorothyC.,&Eisenhart,MargaretA.(1990).Educatedinromance.Chicago:Universityof Chicago Press.Jensen, Margaret Ann. (1984).Loves$weet return: The Harlequin story. Bowling Green, Ohio:Bowling Green State University Popular Press.Kaler, Anne K. & Johnson-Kurek, Rosemary (Eds.). (1999).Romantic conventions. BowlingGreen, Ohio: Bowling Green State University Popular Press.Krentz, Jayne Anne (Ed). (1992).Dangerous men and adventurous women. Philadelphia: Univer-sity of Pennsylvania Press.Mosley, Shelley, Charles, John, and Havir, Julie. (May, 1995). The librarian as effete snob: Whyromance?Wilson Library Bulletin,69, pp. 24–25.Long, Elizabeth. (1992). Textual interpretation as collective action.Discourse, 14, 3: 104–30.Pierce, Kate. (1993). Socialization of teenage girls through teen-magazine fiction: the makingof a new woman or an old lady?Sex Roles,29,1/2. 59–68.Radway, Janice. (1984).Reading the romance. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Ricker-Wilson, Carol. (1999). Busting textual bodices: Gender, reading, and the popular ro-mance.English Journal,88, 3. pp. 57–64